Geotab vs Teletrac Navman: open ecosystem or integrated TN360 fleet stack?

Both support GPS, fleet data, compliance and integrations. The meaningful difference is whether the operation wants Geotab's large marketplace ecosystem or a more vertically packaged TN360 fleet-management experience.

Bottom line

Geotab is the stronger research path when integration breadth, data extensibility and a large marketplace are central requirements. Teletrac Navman deserves the shortlist when the buyer wants TN360 to package tracking, compliance, safety, maintenance and driver communication into a more unified operating experience.

FactorGeotabTeletrac Navman
Primary position

Extensible telematics and fleet-data platform

Connected fleet-management platform built around TN360

Compliance

HOS/ELD available in the GO package

ELD, DVIR and IFTA workflows published

Maintenance

Maintenance scheduling and predictive capabilities by package

Maintenance activity integrated into TN360 workflows

Integrations

400+ Marketplace integrations published

Integrations across maintenance, routing, accounting, fuel and other fleet systems

Pricing

Quote-based

Quote-based; typically scoped by tracked asset and solution

Implementation posture

Can involve reseller and marketplace solution design

Configure TN360 devices, modules and integrations around the fleet

Fleets that want an extensible telematics layer with a large integration ecosystem.

Read Geotab review →

Commercial fleets that want a connected TN360 stack spanning tracking, compliance, safety and maintenance.

Read Teletrac Navman review →

Use fleet size, requirements and implementation tolerance to test the shortlist.

Build a shortlist